한국녹색인증원 - 녹색건축인증

사후평가를 통한 녹색건축인증제도 개선방향 연구 - 서울, 경기, 인천지역 학교시설을 중심으로 A Study on the Improvement of the G-SEED Based on Post-Occupancy Evaluation - Focused on the School Facilities in Seoul, Gyeonggi and Incheon ​ 저자 박정란 소속 동양미래대학교 학술지정보 청소년시설환경 발행정보 한국청소년시설환경학회 2018년 자료제공처 학술교육원 NRF 주제분야 교육 > 학생지도 ​ #녹색건축인증제 , #학교건축 , #사후평가 , #G -SEED, #SchoolFacility , #녹색건축 , #녹색건축인증 ​ <초록> Abstract : There were no cases of re-certification of school facilities until G-SEED ver.2016 because there were noseparate criteria for re-certification of school facilities and no institutional guidelines. Therefore, it did not meetthe purpose of the certification system, known as the sustainable development throughout buildings life cycle. The most important feature of the G-SEED ver.2016 is that the criteria are divided into those for new andexisting buildings. Therefore, buildings assessed on new certificates can be recertified in accordance with the‘G-SEED for Existing Buildings’ wh

사후평가를 통한 녹색건축인증제도 개선방향 연구 - 서울, 경기, 인천지역 학교시설을 중심으로 A Study on the Improvement of the G-SEED Based on Post-Occupancy Evaluation - Focused on the School Facilities in Seoul, Gyeonggi and Incheon ​ 저자 박정란 소속 동양미래대학교 학술지정보 청소년시설환경 발행정보 한국청소년시설환경학회 2018년 자료제공처 학술교육원 NRF 주제분야 교육 > 학생지도 ​ #녹색건축인증제 , #학교건축 , #사후평가 , #G -SEED, #SchoolFacility , #녹색건축 , #녹색건축인증 ​ <초록> Abstract : There were no cases of re-certification of school facilities until G-SEED ver.2016 because there were noseparate criteria for re-certification of school facilities and no institutional guidelines. Therefore, it did not meetthe purpose of the certification system, known as the sustainable development throughout buildings life cycle. The most important feature of the G-SEED ver.2016 is that the criteria are divided into those for new andexisting buildings. Therefore, buildings assessed on new certificates can be recertified in accordance with the‘G-SEED for Existing Buildings’ whe